Re: [boost] needs coroutine2 a review?

Subject: Re: [boost] needs coroutine2 a review?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-21 05:20:37

2015-06-21 11:05 GMT+02:00 Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:

Up to when boost.coroutine will be deprecated?

when boost.coroutine2 is added to the release (but boost.coroutine will
still be avaiable)

> By what users of boost.coroutine in c++98 would replace the deprecated
> library?
>

boost.coroutine will still be part of the release

see discussion ([boost] transforming ex. boost lib into C++11-only lib?)
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/01/219507.php

> Is there any library in Boost that depends on Boost.Coroutine?
>

boost.asio

> I've the impression that you will need to maintain it still for some years.
>

for bug fixing, yes

> In your case, you are adding more but restricted to C++14 compilers. I
> don't think that review is needed in this is the case.
>

OK