Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: QVM (generic Quaternion, Vector and Matrix operations library)
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-26 00:35:00
I love swizzling although I dislike this particular syntax.
I don't see any performance benchmarks which is a deal breaker for me.
I'm pretty happy with Eigen3, I don't see where QVM is providing enough
value to make me consider switching.
Maybe its use as an interop library to stitch disparate libraries
together is enough value to include it in boost. But in that case I
think maybe a smaller addition to the Boost.Geometry library is more
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk