Subject: Re: [boost] Ternary logic programming (was: Re: [variant] Maintainer)
From: VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira (vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-02 23:15:11
2015-07-02 23:37 GMT-03:00 Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>:
> Does this make sense?
Yes, thanks for summarizing. I'm starting to like this abstraction. I'll
let you know if I get any doubts about its design.
Now you just need to address Vicente's concern about the monad name. Maybe
rename result to light_result and monad to result.
-- VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira https://about.me/vinipsmaker
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk