Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-14 06:37:06
On 07/11/2015 11:50 PM, Antony Polukhin wrote:
>> The design rationale and the FAQ seems to be in disagreement about ABI
> Did not get that. At what place do they disagree? ABI != portability.
On what side of that equation does "ABI portability" fit? This may be
the source of the confusion.
As I currently read the documentation, the design rationale leaves the
impression that there is no ABI portability, whereas the FAQ that there
is some (e.g. for aliases.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk