Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-14 23:30:02
On 7/14/2015 7:43 AM, Ralf Globisch wrote:
>> In that case, "symbol loader" or "shared library loader" would be more
>> fitting than "loader" which
>>> could be about other domains.
> I was also thinking along the lines of LL for either Lib Loader or Library Loader.
> Or maybe PLL (Platform-independent Library Loader) might be a phonetic option
> that shows some relationship to DLL but is different enough?
>> Personally I don't care much about the name of the library in this case
>> because almost all the names evoked here seems fine to me,
>> event the platform-specific evocation ones.
Perhaps you could call it Dynamic Library Loader.
And then refer to it using the acronym DLL.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk