Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing
From: Ralf Globisch (rglobisch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-14 08:43:53
> In that case, "symbol loader" or "shared library loader" would be more
> fitting than "loader" which
>> could be about other domains.
I was also thinking along the lines of LL for either Lib Loader or Library Loader.
Or maybe PLL (Platform-independent Library Loader) might be a phonetic option
that shows some relationship to DLL but is different enough?
> Personally I don't care much about the name of the library in this case
> because almost all the names evoked here seems fine to me,
> event the platform-specific evocation ones.
-- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk