Subject: Re: [boost] "Simple C++11 metaprogramming"
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-16 04:29:23
On 30/05/15 23:11, Michael Caisse wrote:
> Within Spirit X3 we have been discussing lightweight metaprogramming in
> the world of C++14. You have articulated very well what we are beginning
> to discover - "I posit that such higher order metaprogramming is, in the
> majority of cases, not necessary in C++11." This thought intrigues me
> and I'm excited to see how far we can take it in libraries such as
> Spirit X3 and boostache.
I don't understand how that's a good thing.
Higher order programming makes programs better.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk