Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CXX11_CONSTEXPR and msvc-14.0
From: Francisco JosÃ© Tapia (fjtapia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-23 16:45:34
In the benchmarks of my sort algorithms, the same code, the same input
data, running on the same machine. With VC++ 2015 need the double of time
than with GCC 4.9.
El 23/07/2015 21:27, "Chris Glover" <c.d.glover_at_[hidden]> escribiÃ³:
> > No, it's entirely serious. But then I'm a fan of MSVC and especially
> > the team they have behind it whom are all seriously impressive
> > engineers at least out of the ones I've met. MSVC has lots of
> > outstanding features no other compiler has:
> > * It's vastly faster to compile, like 5x-10x faster as it's not an
> > AST based compiler like clang and GCC.
> I find this claim interesting because in my (anecdotal) experience over the
> past few years, MSVC is significantly slower than Clang. It seems to be
> generally accepted that MSVC is the fastest, but that is just not my
> > * It generates some very unique assembler which still beats the
> > assembler coming out of clang/LLVM, though it has fallen behind GCC
> > in recent years.
> This is also contrary to my experience. I find that generally both clang
> and gcc generate better code on a more consistent basis.
> -- chris
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk