Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Oleg Grunin (ogrunin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-11 20:41:05
On 8/11/15 2:11 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 8 Aug 2015 at 14:06, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
> The very first sentence makes it very clear it is not a Boost blessed
> document. Moreover, the target audience for that document is the tiny
> number of people wanting to author a Boost library. They tend to be a
> highly sophisticated audience who are subscribed to this list. It's
> not like any Boost library author is going to get misled about
> recommendations in that document being requirements to enter Boost.
1. "The very first sentence" was added today.
2. google 'boost best practices' search brings up your link at the very top.
3. Sophisticated or not, the last thing Boost needs is people being
turned off by all the gobbledygook on it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk