Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Ralf Globisch (rglobisch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-17 06:02:27
> 2. The current CMake support is easier to use for the reviewers who
> want to take the library for a test-drive. Using Boost.Build would
> require that they copy Boost.Http into their Boost source tree. I
> find it unfortunate to force reviewers to "pollute" their Boost
> source tree with candidate libraries.
+1 - strongly agree.
-- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk