Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-17 11:01:17
On 13-Aug-15 2:09 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:
> On August 12, 2015 11:27:09 AM EDT, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 12 Aug 2015 at 9:49, AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© wrote:
>>>> The very first sentence makes it very clear it is not a Boost
>>>> blessed document.
>>> I'm happy with the newly added note claiming that those are your
>>> opinions and yours only. That way others won't feel the need to
>>> that's not a Boost thing every single time you mention it.
> I think everyone is reasonably happy on this point. Let's call a moratorium on it.
Can we first drop the link to that document from http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html#Guidelines though,
or at least move it below other pre-existing recommendations, including such important ones as naming?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk