Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-12 19:09:02
On August 12, 2015 11:27:09 AM EDT, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2015 at 9:49, AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© wrote:
> > > The very first sentence makes it very clear it is not a Boost
> > > blessed document.
> > I'm happy with the newly added note claiming that those are your
> > opinions and yours only. That way others won't feel the need to
> > that's not a Boost thing every single time you mention it.
I think everyone is reasonably happy on this point. Let's call a moratorium on it.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk