Subject: [boost] AFIO review response
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-28 10:42:53
This is my (sadly very short) AFIO review.
I vote NO (to not accept) the library into Boost as I'm not able to tell
whether the library is useful and fit for Boost.
Reason: I tried to understand the design and rationale of the library and
asked a number of questions on this list to clarify things I didn't
understand. Sadly, the author decided not to answer a single of my questions
(not even did he directly respond to any of my emails). I'm not able to make
an educated decision on any of the review criteria without having the
questions answered which I asked.
The reason I send my review now is that I have to make this decision today.
I'll not be able to spend any more time on this before the review period
So far, I have invested a couple of hours reading through the documentation,
following the email threads, and thinking about the design I saw.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk