Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [afio] Formal review of Boost.AFIO

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [afio] Formal review of Boost.AFIO
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-29 11:20:55

On 29 Aug 2015 at 7:57, Robert Ramey wrote:

> >> There have been several suggestions (implicit and explicit) to move this
> >> type into the boost::afio namespace, but I haven' seen a response from
> >> you. Have I just missed it?
> >
> > It's more that the suggestion is irrelevant with respect to the
> > library.
> 
> It is irrelevant to the operation of the library.  But it's certainly no 
> irrelevant with respect to the acceptance of the library.  This is 
> exactly the point I was making.

For sure. But please be aware that the use of Monad is more 
presentational than anything. I foolishly made Monad look like not an 
internal library in the tutorial, and I have been paying for it 
since.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/