Subject: Re: [boost] AFIO review response
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-29 11:27:09
On 29 Aug 2015 at 12:11, AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© wrote:
> On 8/29/2015 11:48 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> > For the record, I requested that the moderators intervene regarding
> > his behaviour early on in this review as I felt no good was going to
> > come of it. They declined to do so.
> This *sounds* deeply concerning. Rather than making assumptions, I would
> appreciate if you could be a bit more concrete on what you mean by it.
> If that request took part in email form, perhaps even give us a link to
> the thread?
I simply forwarded his first two emails with a request that an
intervention be made. I don't know what came of it - they may well
have intervened and not told me. All I know is he kept coming at me
despite my best attempts to ignore him. When he then submitted what I
would consider a fake review which would have to be counted in AFIO's
acceptance or rejection, I felt I was left no choice but to act in my
defense as otherwise my library could be rejected for inappropriate
(For the record, I can see given the reviews to date why it might be
rejected anyway, but that's not the point here. If it came down to
say a score of 3 in favour and 3 against and his review tipped the
scales to 4 against, that would be a big problem).
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk