Subject: Re: [boost] AFIO review response
From: AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-29 11:35:03
On 8/29/2015 12:27 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2015 at 12:11, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
>> On 8/29/2015 11:48 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
>>> For the record, I requested that the moderators intervene regarding
>>> his behaviour early on in this review as I felt no good was going to
>>> come of it. They declined to do so.
>> This *sounds* deeply concerning. Rather than making assumptions, I would
>> appreciate if you could be a bit more concrete on what you mean by it.
>> If that request took part in email form, perhaps even give us a link to
>> the thread?
> I simply forwarded his first two emails with a request that an
> intervention be made.
Thanks. Are those two emails these:
> When he then submitted what I
> would consider a fake review which would have to be counted in AFIO's
> acceptance or rejection, I felt I was left no choice but to act in my
> defense as otherwise my library could be rejected for inappropriate
That's not how the Boost review process works. Votes aren't counted,
they are weighted by a criteria of choice of the review manager.
> (For the record, I can see given the reviews to date why it might be
> rejected anyway, but that's not the point here. If it came down to
> say a score of 3 in favour and 3 against and his review tipped the
> scales to 4 against, that would be a big problem).
Again, that's not how the Boost review process works.
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk