Subject: Re: [boost] AFIO review response
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-29 12:13:38
>> This *sounds* deeply concerning. Rather than making assumptions, I would
>> appreciate if you could be a bit more concrete on what you mean by it.
>> If that request took part in email form, perhaps even give us a link to
>> the thread?
> I simply forwarded his first two emails with a request that an
> intervention be made. I don't know what came of it - they may well
> have intervened and not told me. All I know is he kept coming at me
> despite my best attempts to ignore him. When he then submitted what I
> would consider a fake review which would have to be counted in AFIO's
> acceptance or rejection, I felt I was left no choice but to act in my
> defense as otherwise my library could be rejected for inappropriate
Hmmm, must have got lost in the post/noise, as I didn't see that
request. In any case having reviewed Hartmut's responses, while there
was one intemperate comment, by and large all the reviewers (Hartmut
included) have made many good points. I sense there's a good deal of
misunderstanding / miscommunication going on which is leading to
frustration on all sides, so please folks, lets keep it civilized, so we
can reach a considered conclusion to the review.
Temporarily doffing moderator hat yours, John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk