Subject: Re: [boost] AFIO review response
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-29 18:44:26
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015, Pete Bartlett wrote:
> That seems to be the only substantive design issue - the rest -
> the namespaces, the #if 0, parts of the documentation, the
> irrelevant v1, is basically bike-shedding stuff that could be
> changed after an accept.
I'm still not sure whether that is the only substantive design issue
raised because nobody that has invested some amount of time in looking
at AFIO has gotten past that issue, or because there are no other
Maybe the reason the latter isn't more firmly apparent from the
reviews is because, as Niall has repeatedly intimated, that AFIO as he
has current designed it has very niche appeal.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk