Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.test failures in develop
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-01 18:33:06

On 10/1/15 2:02 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz <at>> writes:

> It is almost 2016. How much longer do we plan to test against c++03? I'm
> with Bjarne here: it is time to move to c++11 enabled world - we all going
> to be better for it.

We're going to test against whatever testers want to test against. And
testers are going test against what testers use. It can't be any other way.

Maybe what you want to suggest is that we include a little metadata in
each library indicated the C++ revision requirements so that the test
system can automatically skip those libraries which the tester doesn't
want or is not able to test against. The column for that tester just
wouldn't appear when not relevant.

Robert Ramey

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at