Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-05 16:22:57

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] Problems building Boost libraries for Windows Store when C++/CX is involved"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"

John Maddock <jz.maddock <at> googlemail.com> writes:

> I can't speak for you, but I nearly always find issues in the online
> testing matrix that are simply not exposed by local testing

Indeed. Yet another reason, why local testing of whole boost is not
practical.

Gennadiy

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] Problems building Boost libraries for Windows Store when C++/CX is involved"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk