Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] Boost.test failures in develop
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-06 14:27:48

Next message: Stephen Kelly: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
Previous message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
In reply to: Raffi Enficiaud: "Re: [boost] [test] Boost.test failures in develop"
Next in thread: Jürgen Hunold: "Re: [boost] [test] Boost.test failures in develop"

Raffi Enficiaud wrote:

> Develop branch has mainly a testing and packaging value
> wrt. other libraries of boost, so the merges to master are cleaner and
> the potential coupling of libraries is properly handled.

I'm very interested in this!

How is potential coupling of libraries handled?

Thanks,

Steve.

Next message: Stephen Kelly: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
Previous message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] boost.test regression or behavior change (was Re: Boost.lockfree)"
In reply to: Raffi Enficiaud: "Re: [boost] [test] Boost.test failures in develop"
Next in thread: Jürgen Hunold: "Re: [boost] [test] Boost.test failures in develop"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk