Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-12-04 14:55:40

On 12/4/2015 2:25 PM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> 2015-12-04 15:48 GMT+01:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86_at_[hidden]>:
> Please go back to that thread where people put their time and effort at
>> your disposal to provide feedback for your library. Take with you pen and
>> paper, and write each piece of feedback down, even those you've already
>> acted on. Then let us know which of them you have addressed, and how you
>> have done so (accepted, discarded, reasons, etc). This will help us avoid
>> wasting our time now looking for things that haven't yet been addressed,
>> like documentation changes, and it will help you to get ready for the next
>> round of review so that we don't waste everyone's time then.
> I'm sorry that I waste your time

Let's just focus on addressing all that feedback that has thus far been

>> Note that I have provided extensive and detailed feedback during the first
>> review, and a big chunk of it was ignored, lost, or dropped on the floor.
> I used the summary of the last review

Of all the messages I sent during the review, only one of them was
directed at the review manager. I believe the goal of the review
summary is to present us, reviewers and casual bystanders, with a
general view of what went on during the review. I might be wrong at
that, but I don't think the goal of the summary is to exempt you, the
library author, of having to read all the discussion and feedback meant
for you to improve the quality of your library. And I happen to think
Nat did a great job with it.


Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at