Subject: [boost] Fwd: Re: [Boost-users] [boost-users][QVM] Boost.QVM formal review is ongoing
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-12-14 21:23:46
It seems that you've send a response to the boost-users list and I'm
guessing Emil is not a subscriber because he haven't responded. So I'm
forwarding it to the developers mailing list.
I'm not qualified to give a full review of this library beyond observing:
1 It looks very useful.
2 Boost prefers clarity to curtness. The naming is much too terse making the resulting code rather
'write-only'. I'd at least go for col_mat for col_m and transpose for transp etc. (I know any
changes will be a big PITA but shows that asking sooner than later is a good idea for would-be Boost
library authors ;-)
3 Documentation is OK, but I'd like many more examples of every function, and some much bigger
fuller real-life examples showing use too.
4 Does this mesh at all with the quaternions in Boost.Math library?
PS If you build the Boost inspect tool \modular-boost\tools\inspect by running its jamfile, (and
making sure that it is in your PATH) then from your /doc folder you can simply call
> inspect > inspect.html
and view any transgressions of the Boost rules in inspect.html - and, most important, any dud links.
You may get a few false positives, but you can spot these easily.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830 _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users_at_[hidden] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk