Re: [boost] Recommended Boost file structure?

Subject: Re: [boost] Recommended Boost file structure?
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-04 13:54:07

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Steven Watanabe
> Sent: 04 March 2016 17:54
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Recommended Boost file structure?
> 
> AMDG
> 
> On 03/04/2016 10:04 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > I've been looking at the structure of Phil Bouchard's prototype block_ptr library and am wondering if the structure of the
> header
> > files is optimal/Boost_Standard/wrong.
> >
> > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_60_0/more/getting_started/windows.html
> >
> > describes the Boost structure, but looks well out of date to me.
> >
> 
> I assume you're referring to this:
> 
> boost_1_60_0\ .................The "boost root directory"
>    <snip>
>    boost\ .........................All Boost Header files
> 
> This is still true for the release packages,
> which have all the headers moved into boost/.

Yes, but surely people need to be warned that there will 'appear' to be two copies in the two locations?

If all goes well, they won't notice, but Murphy's Law says they will ;-)

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal UK LA8 8AB
[phone]