Subject: Re: [boost] Recommended Boost file structure?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-04 14:15:29
On 03/04/2016 11:54 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> I assume you're referring to this:
>> boost_1_60_0\ .................The "boost root directory"
>> boost\ .........................All Boost Header files
>> This is still true for the release packages,
>> which have all the headers moved into boost/.
> Yes, but surely people need to be warned that there will 'appear' to be two copies in the two locations?
"moved" not "copied." The release archives
do not contain libs/xxx/include.
> If all goes well, they won't notice, but Murphy's Law says they will ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk