Re: [boost] Recommended Boost file structure?

Subject: Re: [boost] Recommended Boost file structure?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-04 14:15:29

AMDG

On 03/04/2016 11:54 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I assume you're referring to this:
>>
>> boost_1_60_0\ .................The "boost root directory"
>>    <snip>
>>    boost\ .........................All Boost Header files
>>
>> This is still true for the release packages,
>> which have all the headers moved into boost/.
> 
> Yes, but surely people need to be warned that there will 'appear' to be two copies in the two locations?
> 

"moved" not "copied."  The release archives
do not contain libs/xxx/include.

> If all goes well, they won't notice, but Murphy's Law says they will ;-)
> 

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe