Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Alternative names to Boost.Fit
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-10 17:42:16

On 11/03/2016 07:52, Paul Fultz II wrote:
> On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 12:42:59 AM UTC-6, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> wrote:
>> Paul if the scope of the library is high order function I propose to
>> rename it to Boost.HighOrderFunctions. We could use boost::hof as name
>> space and boost/hof/ as folder.
> The adaptors and decorators are HOFs, and the other functions are used to
> help when using HOFs, so it does make sense to name it
>Boost.HighOrderFunctions. I like this name.

Or perhaps, HighOrderFunctionLibrary?

          ___^___ _
  L __/ [] \
LOL===__ \
  L \___ ___ ___]
               I I

(I regret nothing.)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at