Subject: Re: [boost] [endian] Project not maintained
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-05 10:23:12
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Boost.Endian and let's call it Boost.BinarySerialization may have similar
>> interfaces, but they are not required to work similarly.
> Not "similar". The same. And not "similarly". In the exact same way.
> Remarkable how you deliberately miss my point.
I guess I just don't understand why you think the two libraries must
work the same way. To me endian conversion and serialization are two
different things, even if sometimes they seem to produce the same
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk