Re: [boost] Interest in a "concepts lite" library?

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a "concepts lite" library?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-20 10:56:57

On 4/20/16 1:48 AM, Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente wrote:
> Hi!
>
> With concepts lite not getting into C++17, the need for library-based
> alternatives becomes more apparent.  With this regard, the current
> Boost.ConceptCheck library is outdated, as it emulates an too old
> proposal for concepts, and it does not leverage more modern techniques
> (e.g. expression sfinae).

I think such an effort is long overdue. The world needs a modern 
replacement for BCC.  As mentioned in other posts, tick would also be a 
candidate.  There might be others.  I would like to see them 
considered/reviewed as a group in order to select the best candidate for 
boost.

Robert Ramey