Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a "concepts lite" library?
From: Paul Fultz II (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-20 17:23:33
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 4/20/16 1:48 AM, Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente wrote:
>> With concepts lite not getting into C++17, the need for library-based
>> alternatives becomes more apparent. With this regard, the current
>> Boost.ConceptCheck library is outdated, as it emulates an too old
>> proposal for concepts, and it does not leverage more modern techniques
>> (e.g. expression sfinae).
> I think such an effort is long overdue. The world needs a modern replacement for BCC. As mentioned in other posts, tick would also be a candidate. There might be others. I would like to see them considered/reviewed as a group in order to select the best candidate for boost.
As this is all a volunteer effort, I think I would rather see better collaboration instead of competing.
> Robert Ramey
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk