Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a "concepts lite" library?
From: Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente (raskolnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-21 03:03:32
>> I think such an effort is long overdue. The world needs a modern
>> replacement for BCC. As mentioned in other posts, tick would also
>> be a candidate. There might be others. I would like to see them
>> considered/reviewed as a group in order to select the best
>> candidate for boost.
> As this is all a volunteer effort, I think I would rather see better
> collaboration instead of competing.
Agreed. I have been reviewing your library and , bike-sheds about
conventions and nomenclature aside, it seems like best candidate for an
initial basis, because: 1) it is more feature complete and 2) provides
better compiler support.
Please let me know what you think is the remaining work to be done
before a formal submission and I'll help with that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk