Subject: Re: [boost] proposed new library "histogram"
From: Hans Dembinski (hans.dembinski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-05 17:26:25
Sorry, yes that's true, I mean C++03.
On 5/5/16 12:35 PM, Jason Rhinelander wrote:
> On 05/05/16 11:39 AM, Hans Dembinski wrote:
>> ... without sacrificing C++0x compatibility, ...
>> Support for C++0x is essential ...
>> This project contains an easy-to-use powerful n-dimensional histogram
>> class implemented in C++0x
> Your usage here of "C++0x", both in your documentation and your
> replies in this thread, appears to be contradicting what you mean:
> C++0x was the informal name for what eventually became C++11 (see
> http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html). But what you seem to mean
> (judging from the context of your replies) is C++03, not C++11.
> Jason Rhinelander
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk