Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.61.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-06 02:31:23
On 06/05/2016 00:44, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Vladimir Prus <vladimir.prus_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> There are two tickets:
>> Thanks - that sounds like unfortunate situation, and that boost::any can't
>> do much, as its constructor is designed to accept anything.
>> I've cherry-picked that commit - could you double-check that the master
>> branch of the superproject is now fine?
> The commits weren't in master because I made the fix after master was
> already closed for 1.61. I was waiting for it to re-open after the
> release. The fixes were just a work-around for a broken compiler, I
> really don't see why the release process should be bothering with
I would guess Stephan is in better position to say whether it's indeed
broken compiler - from his blog post it sounds like accurate implementation
of a broken/suboptimal specification.
Anyway, boost::signals2, boost::any and boost::variant seem like fairly important
parts of Boost, there are already two independent bug reports, and having this
problem on the most recent version of a popular compiler is somewhat embarrassing.
If it can be solved by delaying the release by a day or so, it seems reasonable.
Do you see any reason why this commit might explode on master?
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimirprus.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk