Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.61.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-06 02:38:35
On 06/05/2016 00:13, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
> [Vladimir Prus]
>> Thanks - that sounds like unfortunate situation, and that
>> boost::any can't do much, as its constructor is designed to accept anything.
> Can you avoid using 1-tuples internally? 2-tuples aren't affected by this breaking change.
Are you suggesting that boost::signals2 specially handles the case of 1 parameter,
and starts using 2-tuples in that case? Only Frank can tell how much effort that
would be, but it sounds rather intrusive.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimirprus.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk