Subject: Re: [boost] Request for a "Policy Review" regarding 'CMakeLists.txt'
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 10:55:40
On 17/05/2016 17:51, Thijs van den Berg wrote:
> Any bjam conventions discussion, validation historical choices etc is a
> separate discussion. This discussion here is if we should pave the way to
> facilitate CMake users and do so correctly by sticking to accepted
> conventions, and add the CMakeLists.txt to the root or not.
No, it's not a separate discussion - that's why Rene has asked for a specific
proposed change to the library requirements, in a form of diff or pull request.
If that was done, this thread would have converged already.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimirprus.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk