Subject: Re: [boost] Request for a "Policy Review" regarding 'CMakeLists.txt'
From: Thijs van den Berg (thijs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 10:59:37
On 17 May 2016 at 16:55, Vladimir Prus <vladimir.prus_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 17/05/2016 17:51, Thijs van den Berg wrote:
> Any bjam conventions discussion, validation historical choices etc is a
>> separate discussion. This discussion here is if we should pave the way to
>> facilitate CMake users and do so correctly by sticking to accepted
>> conventions, and add the CMakeLists.txt to the root or not.
> No, it's not a separate discussion - that's why Rene has asked for a
> proposed change to the library requirements, in a form of diff or pull
> If that was done, this thread would have converged already.
I expect that pull request to be nothing more than
"I you want to add support for CMake to your library then place the
CMakeLists.txt file at the root." I don't expect it will mention the word
bjam in any way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk