Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Request for a "Policy Review" regarding 'CMakeLists.txt'
From: Sam Kellett (samkellett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 12:59:48


On 17 May 2016 at 16:35, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 18:24:36 MSK Sam Kellett wrote:
> > On 17 May 2016 at 16:05, Andrey Semashev
> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > > I should say that many
> > > opensource projects practice a separate directory for build-related
> stuff
> > > and it doesn't
> > > hurt anyone (quite the contrary, I'd say).
> >
> > which ones?
>
> From the ones I have locally: TBB, openh264, webrtc, libvpx,
> libresiprocate. Well, ok, some of them have a configure script or a
> single Makefile at the root directory, but most of the build stuff is put
> in
> a subdirectory.
>

unless i'm looking at the wrong repositories but every single one of those
examples has at least one build file in the root


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk