Subject: Re: [boost] Request for a "Policy Review" regarding 'CMakeLists.txt'
From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 13:00:16
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Vladimir Prus <vladimir.prus_at_[hidden]>
> On 17/05/2016 15:41, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> On 05/17/2016 12:46 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> Just to clarify, you are proposing that a library author may add
>>> CMakeLists.txt at
>>> the top level, while Jamfile is required to be in the 'build'
>>> I am strongly -1 about such an arrangement - it makes unofficial build
>>> system more
>>> prominently visible than the official one,
>> I don't think that's a a big problem
>> for libraries, as the most visible
>> part of the build system is still the
>> superproject's Jamroot.
> It is still a problem when somebody looks at sources of a particular
> say on GitHub.
This is a feature, one that will likely mean a significant number of extra
users. There is no confusion out there as to whether or not boost is built
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk