Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 17:32:00
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 5/17/16 10:27 AM, David Sankel wrote:
>> This means life or death for boost and, frankly,
> it's been dying over the past few years.
> I think we're on a good path.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk