Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Paul Fultz II (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 20:37:11
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 4:32:42 PM UTC-5, David Sankel wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Robert Ramey <ra..._at_[hidden]
> > On 5/17/16 10:27 AM, David Sankel wrote:
> >> This means life or death for boost and, frankly,
> > it's been dying over the past few years.
> > I think we're on a good path.
I think that is a strong demonstration.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk