Re: [boost] Boost Evolution

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 21:08:28

On 5/17/16 5:37 PM, Paul Fultz II wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 4:32:42 PM UTC-5, David Sankel wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Robert Ramey <ra..._at_[hidden]
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/17/16 10:27 AM, David Sankel wrote:
>>>
>>>> This means life or death for boost and, frankly,
>>>>
>>> it's been dying over the past few years.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we're on a good path.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=%2Fm%2F034w42%2C%20cmake%2C%20bjam&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B6
>
>
> I think that is a strong demonstration.

LOL - I'm not convinced.  I loved the display and couldn't resist 
playing around with it.  It only took a few seconds to generate the 
following:

https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=C%2B%2B%20boost

Robert Ramey

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>