Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Vladimir Batov (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 22:22:44
On 05/18/2016 12:19 PM, David Sankel wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> LOL - I'm not convinced. I loved the display and couldn't resist playing
> around with it. It only took a few seconds to generate the following:
> Nice, you managed to do a search for 'c+boost'. While I find smoothies
> interesting, it is completely irrelevant to this discussion.
I do not believe it's true. I clearly see Search term: "C++ boost"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk