Re: [boost] Boost Evolution

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Vladimir Batov (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 22:28:43

On 05/18/2016 12:22 PM, Vladimir Batov wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 12:19 PM, David Sankel wrote:
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> LOL - I'm not convinced.  I loved the display and couldn't resist 
>> playing
>> around with it.  It only took a few seconds to generate the following:
>>
>> https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=C%2B%2B%20boost
>>
>> Nice, you managed to do a search for 'c+boost'. While I find smoothies
>> interesting, it is completely irrelevant to this discussion.
>>
>
> I do not believe it's true. I clearly see Search term: "C++ boost"

More so. If one tries to search for "C++ Boost" (as Robert suggested) 
and for "Boost software" as you David suggested you'll immediately see 
that people by far prefer Robert's (I do).