Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Vladimir Batov (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 22:28:43
On 05/18/2016 12:22 PM, Vladimir Batov wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 12:19 PM, David Sankel wrote:
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> LOL - I'm not convinced. I loved the display and couldn't resist
>> around with it. It only took a few seconds to generate the following:
>> Nice, you managed to do a search for 'c+boost'. While I find smoothies
>> interesting, it is completely irrelevant to this discussion.
> I do not believe it's true. I clearly see Search term: "C++ boost"
More so. If one tries to search for "C++ Boost" (as Robert suggested)
and for "Boost software" as you David suggested you'll immediately see
that people by far prefer Robert's (I do).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk