Subject: Re: [boost] [EXTERNAL] Request for a "Policy Review" regarding 'CMakeLists.txt'
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-19 16:29:54
Le 19/05/16 Ã 18:18, Belcourt, Kenneth a Ã©crit :
>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:52 PM, Vladimir Prus <vladimir.prus_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 18/05/2016 20:20, Paul Fultz II wrote:
>>>> The original post on the thread stated:
>>>> "We recommend and propose that the Boost Guidelines are modified to
>>>> allow library authors, at their own discretion, to include a
>>>> 'CMakeLists.txt' file in their library's top-level directory."
>>>> Leave aside the fact this as far as I know this has never been
>>>> prohibited. It seems that the request is that the stated policy
>>>> incorporate the above text and that no one has actually argued against
>>>> this. It seems to me that you're getting exactly what been asked for.
>>> Rene has made it clear that it was prohibited by the guidelines, and
>>> Vladimir is opposed to it.
>> I am specifically opposed to permitting cmake stuff at root level of
>> a library while requiring that Boost.Build files are in the 'build' directory.
>> This objection can be addressed by either allowing all of that at the root
>> (not really facetious suggestion), or by requiring that all build files
>> be under 'build' directory - which has the advantage of actually scaling,
>> and apparently is possible with all possible build systems. In the latter
>> case the guidelines might be amended to say that library author can add
>> additional build systems support, though in practice we already have makefiles
>> and VS solutions and what not.
> Iâd like to see the CMake files in the same locations as the Jamfiles so we have a consistent layout for build and test across Boost.
If this is a poll, I also say +1
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk