Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's community*
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-22 11:19:42

Next message: Thomas Heller: "Re: [boost] Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's community*"
Previous message: Klemens Morgenstern: "Re: [boost] Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's community*"
In reply to: Klemens Morgenstern: "Re: [boost] Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's community*"
Next in thread: Thomas Heller: "Re: [boost] Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's community*"

Klemens Morgenstern wrote:

> But keeping new libraries on C++11 or C++98 is not very useful;

We don't keep new libraries C++11 or C++98.

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk