Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-24 15:04:00

Antony Polukhin wrote:

> I'm writing stacktrace library as a prototype for further adoption into 
> the C++ Standard (I've got big ambitions and groundless optimism). 
> Additional dependency to std::optional could make the adoption harder.

In what way could a dependency on std::optional make the adoption harder? 
You can't get stacktrace into C++14, can you? C++20 is the earliest 
possible. And C++17 already has optional.

(Of course you could always return pointers instead.)