Subject: Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-24 15:04:00
Antony Polukhin wrote:
> I'm writing stacktrace library as a prototype for further adoption into
> the C++ Standard (I've got big ambitions and groundless optimism).
> Additional dependency to std::optional could make the adoption harder.
In what way could a dependency on std::optional make the adoption harder?
You can't get stacktrace into C++14, can you? C++20 is the earliest
possible. And C++17 already has optional.
(Of course you could always return pointers instead.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk