Subject: Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-25 15:02:05
2016-10-24 22:04 GMT+03:00 Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]>:
> Antony Polukhin wrote:
>> I'm writing stacktrace library as a prototype for further adoption into
>> the C++ Standard (I've got big ambitions and groundless optimism).
>> Additional dependency to std::optional could make the adoption harder.
> In what way could a dependency on std::optional make the adoption harder?
> You can't get stacktrace into C++14, can you? C++20 is the earliest
> possible. And C++17 already has optional.
I've heard rumors a long time ago that std::type_info has no method
returning demngled name because that method will add dependency to
<string> header for <typeinfo> header. So I prefer to depend on a
minimal subset of headers.
-- Best regards, Antony Polukhin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk