Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library
From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-25 15:28:31

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>>> 2016-10-25 22:00 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed <nat_at_[hidden]>:

>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>>>>> Is it ok to have a nonmovable type for a stack frame?

>>>> Could it be move-only?

> Memory allocation will happen for each backend in that case, so users
> would like to specify allocators... and that's what I'd like to avoid
> even more than dangling references.

So okay, propose the frame type as immovable and let's see how
reviewers respond. I think it would be good if your documentation
explains the reasons for this decision: the tradeoffs you rejected.