Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-25 15:38:06

2016-10-25 22:28 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed <nat_at_[hidden]>:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>>> 2016-10-25 22:00 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed <nat_at_[hidden]>:
>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Is it ok to have a nonmovable type for a stack frame?
>
>>>>> Could it be move-only?
>
>> Memory allocation will happen for each backend in that case, so users
>> would like to specify allocators... and that's what I'd like to avoid
>> even more than dangling references.
>
> So okay, propose the frame type as immovable and let's see how
> reviewers respond. I think it would be good if your documentation
> explains the reasons for this decision: the tradeoffs you rejected.

Good point!

I'll polish the implementation and docs soon.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin