Subject: [boost] [preprocessor] PR decision for Intel C++ 17 on up on Windows
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-27 16:11:38
I need some guidance from Boost developers in general.
A PR has been issued for Boost PP which only affects Intel C++ 17 on up
in Windows. I can ascertain that only this compiler in Windows is
affectd by the PR. Needless to say I do not test this personally because
it costs a decent amount of money to buy a license. Intel does
graciously offer free licenses for Intel C++ on Linux for Boost
developers and I have used it to test the compiler under Linux. Also
there are no regression tests for Intel C++ on Windows in the 'develop'
or 'master' regression test matrices.
While the person who issued the PR ascertains that it fixes problems for
Boost libraries he uses with Intel C++ 17 on Windows the nature of the
PR is drastic enough that it could easily break other libraries if the
changes in the PR does not correspond to Intel C++ preprocessing in all
cases. So my quandary is what to do about the PR.
The PR is at
It is another one of these cases, like clang targeting VC++, where a
compiler implementation on Windows wants to emulate the non-standard
VC++ preprocessor but can't quite get it right ( as if emulating a
broken preprocessor should ever be right ).
Thoughts ? Ideas ? Suggestions ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk