Subject: Re: [boost] [process] Formal Review starts today, 27 October
From: Klemens Morgenstern (klemens.morgenstern_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-27 16:49:23
Am 27.10.2016 um 21:27 schrieb Antony Polukhin:
> 2016-10-27 20:41 GMT+03:00 Klemens Morgenstern <klemens.morgenstern_at_[hidden]>:
>> Am 27.10.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Johannes:
>>> following you can find my little review of the process library.
>>> Unfortunately, I have no more time to dive into more details of the library.
>>> But from what I have read and seen on the list I think that the library
>>> would be a good addition to boost. The author seems to be quite
>>> knowledgeable about the library domain and I think that he will bring it
>>> into the state that will be consensus after the review.
>> Thank you for your review. It was surely a mistake to only read the sources
>> of the doc for errors, so I missed too many things; I'm really confused why
>> so many links didn't work. I fear I cannot change the documentation during
>> the review, but you're certainly right, it is a weak point. Nevertheless,
>> I'll go through and address your points, so other reviewers might have some
>> questions answered.
> It is allowed to fix links/typos in the docs during review. Just make sure that:
> * the docs are always available
> * that sections do not change their names and addresses
> In that way people will get the fixed docs and links to sections will
> remain valid during the whole discussion.
Awesome, I updated the documentation, and fixed a lot of typos.
I did not yet add detailed descriptions for nm, c++filt and coroutines,
but I linked to their documentation. I'll gladly write more
documentation after the review, since hastily adding them now would only
result in more errors and confusion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk